Who knows? I suppose it could be erroneous
To say all politicians are felonious.
Although, they never want to be harmonious,
And are always happy to seem parsimonious
And they really like being sanctimonious
And they hate to do things unceremonious.
There’s no fame in being unceremonious.
Heck, they’re more newsworthy being erroneous,
And on FOX it’s best to be sanctimonious.
And a politician who is felonious
Is OK as long as he’s parsimonious
With those in need. But he can’t harmonious.
No one cares about a pol who is harmonious,
Who doesn’t huff and swear unceremonious.
To be belligerently parsimonious
Makes it acceptable to be erroneous
And even quite astoundingly felonious
So long as the pol remains sanctimonious.
Big donors really like the sanctimonious
And shun all those who want to be harmonious.
They do not mind a guy who is felonious
If he agrees to be unceremonious
While he’s being purposefully erroneous
To help make it seem like his parsimonious
Stance is justified, and his parsimonious
Votes are much more than just some sanctimonious
Claptrap. Oh, his reasons might be erroneous,
But so long as he doesn’t get harmonious
And is really very unceremonious
In making accusations of felonious
Actions by others, he can be felonious
Himself. The goal is to be parsimonious
With all but his pals. Then, unceremonious
Harrumphing and being quite sanctimonious
And refusing to be at all harmonious
Pleases those who pay him to be erroneous.
Pols, unceremonious and felonious,
Ever erroneous, always parsimonious
And sanctimonious, detest the harmonious.